3

Apiavi food hygiene rating

Retailers - other · Barnet

Apiavi holds a 3: generally satisfactory. The shop met the legal standard, but the inspector recorded enough minor issues that it fell short of a good or very good rating.

The rating: 3 - Generally satisfactory

The rating dates from 15 May 2024, more than 2 years ago. A lot can change in a kitchen in that time, and a rating this old says more about the business then than now. Councils prioritise re-inspecting higher-risk premises, so a long gap often means the business is considered low-risk.

Address: 468 Long Lane London, N2 8JL

How it compares in Barnet

In Barnet, 60% of rated places manage a 5, so Apiavi sits behind roughly 1,997 nearby businesses. 10% of the borough shares its 3.

Every rated food business in Barnet
5 out of 5 1,423 60%
4 out of 5 574 24%
3 out of 5 226 10% ← Apiavi
2 out of 5 84 4%
1 out of 5 44 2%
0 out of 5 3 <1%

A further 513 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.

What the inspector found

An inspection scores three things: how food is handled, the physical condition of the premises, and how much the inspector trusts management to keep standards up. At Apiavi none of the three raised a concern, the overall rating is only ever as strong as its weakest area, so a clean sweep is what produces a high score.

Food hygiene ratings nearby

The closest food businesses to Apiavi, nearest first, so you can see how it compares to its neighbours.

Business Distance Rating Inspected
Archer Academy School/college/university 0.3 miles away 5 - Very good 17 November 2025
3R Express Retailers - other 0.6 miles away 5 - Very good 23 February 2026
All Saints Church Other catering premises 0.6 miles away 5 - Very good 6 November 2022
Albanian Association Pub/bar/nightclub 0.9 miles away 5 - Very good 1 October 2022
B Green Retailers - other 1.0 miles away 5 - Very good 26 May 2022

Questions about Apiavi

What is Apiavi's food hygiene rating?

Apiavi has a food hygiene rating of 3 out of 5 (generally satisfactory), given by Barnet Council on 15 May 2024.

Is Apiavi safe to eat at?

A 3 means the shop met the legal standard, so it is lawful to eat there, but the inspector recorded issues that stopped it scoring higher. It is the middle of the scale.

When was Apiavi last inspected?

Apiavi was last inspected on 15 May 2024, more than 2 years ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Barnet Council rather than by the business.

What did the inspector find at Apiavi?

The inspector scored three areas. Hygienic food handling was rated "generally satisfactory", the cleanliness and condition of the building "good", and confidence in the management of food safety "generally satisfactory". Lower concern in all three is what earns a high overall rating.

How does Apiavi compare to other places in Barnet?

60% of the 2,354 rated food businesses in Barnet hold the top rating of 5, while Apiavi holds a 3. 226 places in the area share that rating.

Who decides the rating?

Barnet Council inspects Apiavi and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.

Tell me when this changes

The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch Apiavi and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.

Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →

Understanding this rating

More food hygiene ratings near here

Barnet inspects and rates 2,867 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Barnet

The official record is held by the council: http://www.barnet.gov.uk/

Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →