5

Zizzi & Coco Di Mama food hygiene rating

Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen · Canterbury City

Zizzi & Coco Di Mama holds a 5, the highest food hygiene rating there is. At its last inspection the restaurant met every standard the inspector checked, with nothing needing attention.

The rating: 5 - Very good

The rating dates from 29 January 2024, more than 2 years ago. A lot can change in a kitchen in that time, and a rating this old says more about the business then than now. Councils prioritise re-inspecting higher-risk premises, so a long gap often means the business is considered low-risk.

Address: 53 St Peters Street, Canterbury, Kent, CT1 2BE

How it compares in Canterbury City

That puts Zizzi & Coco Di Mama among the 1,161 places in Canterbury City holding top marks, 78% of everywhere the council rates. A 5 is the norm here rather than the exception, so it is the rating to expect, not to be impressed by.

Every rated food business in Canterbury City
5 out of 5 1,161 78% ← Zizzi & Coco Di Mama
4 out of 5 185 12%
3 out of 5 120 8%
2 out of 5 14 1%
1 out of 5 2 <1%
0 out of 5 1 <1%

A further 166 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.

Food hygiene ratings nearby

The closest food businesses to Zizzi & Coco Di Mama, nearest first, so you can see how it compares to its neighbours.

Business Distance Rating Inspected
Ask Italian Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen 82 yards away 5 - Very good 16 September 2025
Chiya Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen 90 yards away 5 - Very good 23 September 2025
Bakers + Baristas Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen 95 yards away 5 - Very good 23 April 2026
Caterlink - St Peters Methodist Primary School School/college/university 108 yards away 5 - Very good 10 March 2025
Abode Canterbury Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen 132 yards away 5 - Very good 23 April 2026
Bengal Mart Retailers - supermarkets/hypermarkets 252 yards away 5 - Very good 10 December 2025
A.T. Patisserie Farmers/growers 257 yards away 5 - Very good 18 November 2025
Bare Bones Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen 259 yards away 5 - Very good 20 March 2025

Questions about Zizzi & Coco Di Mama

What is Zizzi & Coco Di Mama's food hygiene rating?

Zizzi & Coco Di Mama has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good), given by Canterbury City Council on 29 January 2024.

Is Zizzi & Coco Di Mama safe to eat at?

The rating covers hygiene standards found at inspection, not the food itself. At 5 out of 5, the inspector found hygiene standards at this restaurant to be very good, the top end of the scale.

When was Zizzi & Coco Di Mama last inspected?

Zizzi & Coco Di Mama was last inspected on 29 January 2024, more than 2 years ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Canterbury City Council rather than by the business.

How does Zizzi & Coco Di Mama compare to other places in Canterbury City?

78% of the 1,483 rated food businesses in Canterbury City hold the top rating of 5, and Zizzi & Coco Di Mama is one of them.

Who decides the rating?

Canterbury City Council inspects Zizzi & Coco Di Mama and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.

Tell me when this changes

The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch Zizzi & Coco Di Mama and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.

Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →

Understanding this rating

More food hygiene ratings near here

Canterbury City inspects and rates 1,649 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Canterbury City

The official record is held by the council: http://www.canterbury.gov.uk

Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →