Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall food hygiene rating
Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen · Ealing
Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall holds a 2, which means some improvement is necessary. The inspector found problems at the restaurant that the business is required to fix.
The rating: 2 - Some improvement necessary
The rating dates from 21 November 2025, 7 months ago. Councils typically re-inspect higher-risk businesses every six months to two years, with well-run, low-risk places visited least often, so this is a normal gap.
Address: 68 The Green, Southall, UB2 4BG
How it compares in Ealing
A 2 is rare: only 212 of 3,050 rated places in Ealing score this low, about one in 14. By contrast 58% of the borough holds a 5, so this is well below what the council's inspectors normally find.
| 5 out of 5 | 1,772 | 58% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 out of 5 | 617 | 20% | ||
| 3 out of 5 | 285 | 9% | ||
| 2 out of 5 | 212 | 7% | ← Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall | |
| 1 out of 5 | 135 | 4% | ||
| 0 out of 5 | 29 | 1% |
A further 621 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.
What the inspector found
- Hygienic food handling Improvement necessary
- Cleanliness & condition of the building Improvement necessary
- How well they manage food safety Generally satisfactory
An inspection scores three things: how food is handled, the physical condition of the premises, and how much the inspector trusts management to keep standards up. At Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall the inspector recorded concerns over how food is handled and the condition of the premises. Because the overall rating is only ever as strong as its weakest area, that is what holds the score down.
Food hygiene ratings nearby
The closest food businesses to Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall, nearest first, so you can see how it compares to its neighbours.
| Business | Distance | Rating | Inspected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apna Pind Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen | 282 yards away | 5 - Very good | 11 June 2026 |
| Apna Punjab Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen | 287 yards away | 5 - Very good | 6 August 2024 |
| Aljaburi Restaurant & Cafe Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen | 304 yards away | 5 - Very good | 11 June 2025 |
| Ayaan Bangla Fish Bazaar Retailers - other | 381 yards away | 5 - Very good | 15 May 2023 |
| AN& Mobile caterer | 396 yards away | 5 - Very good | 12 May 2026 |
| AAK Superstore Retailers - other | 0.3 miles away | 5 - Very good | 24 June 2024 |
| Amigos Burgers Southall Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen | 0.3 miles away | 5 - Very good | 26 March 2026 |
| Aramark @ Southall Community College School/college/university | 0.3 miles away | 5 - Very good | 20 November 2024 |
Questions about Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall
What is Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall's food hygiene rating?
Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall has a food hygiene rating of 2 out of 5 (some improvement necessary), given by Ealing Council on 21 November 2025.
Is Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall safe to eat at?
A 2 means the inspector found problems the business is required to fix. The restaurant is not shut down, a rating is not a closure order, but standards were found to be below what the law expects at the time of inspection.
When was Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall last inspected?
Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall was last inspected on 21 November 2025, 7 months ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Ealing Council rather than by the business.
What did the inspector find at Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall?
The inspector scored three areas. Hygienic food handling was rated "improvement necessary", the cleanliness and condition of the building "improvement necessary", and confidence in the management of food safety "generally satisfactory". Lower concern in all three is what earns a high overall rating.
How does Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall compare to other places in Ealing?
58% of the 3,050 rated food businesses in Ealing hold the top rating of 5, while Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall holds a 2. 212 places in the area share that rating.
Who decides the rating?
Ealing Council inspects Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.
Tell me when this changes
The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.
Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →
Is this your business?
A rating of 2 is public, and most customers look. Only 18% of people say they would order from a business rated 2 or below, against 94% from one rated 4. Delivery platforms may decline to list you.
We cannot change this rating, and nor can you. It was set by an environmental health officer at Ealing, and it stands until they inspect again. What you can do:
- Fix what the inspector found, then ask the council for a re-inspection. Most charge between £120 and £316, and will not re-visit within three months of the original inspection.
- If you believe the rating is simply wrong, you have 21 days from being notified to appeal to the council. That is 21 calendar days, not working days.
- You may submit a right to reply at any time. It is published alongside the rating, here, and on the FSA's own site.
What a low rating means → · How re-inspections and appeals work →
Your council: Ealing
Understanding this rating
More food hygiene ratings near here
Tudor Rose Banqueting Hall is one of 638 rated food businesses in Southall. See every hygiene rating in Southall →
Ealing inspects and rates 3,671 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Ealing →
The official record is held by the council: https://www.ealing.gov.uk/info/201150/food_hygiene_and_safety
Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →