Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club food hygiene rating
Other catering premises · Waverley
Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club holds a 4, meaning hygiene standards at the business are good. It is a solid result, the inspector found nothing serious, though a 5 was just out of reach.
The rating: 4 - Good
The rating dates from 24 July 2025, 11 months ago. Councils typically re-inspect higher-risk businesses every six months to two years, with well-run, low-risk places visited least often, so this is a normal gap.
How it compares in Waverley
In Waverley, 79% of rated places manage a 5, so Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club sits behind roughly 755 nearby businesses. 12% of the borough shares its 4.
| 5 out of 5 | 755 | 79% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 out of 5 | 113 | 12% | ← Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club | |
| 3 out of 5 | 60 | 6% | ||
| 2 out of 5 | 22 | 2% | ||
| 1 out of 5 | 9 | 1% | ||
| 0 out of 5 | 1 | <1% |
A further 107 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.
What the inspector found
- Hygienic food handling Good
- Cleanliness & condition of the building Very good
- How well they manage food safety Generally satisfactory
An inspection scores three things: how food is handled, the physical condition of the premises, and how much the inspector trusts management to keep standards up. At Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club none of the three raised a concern, the overall rating is only ever as strong as its weakest area, so a clean sweep is what produces a high score.
Questions about Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club
What is Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club's food hygiene rating?
Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good), given by Waverley Council on 24 July 2025.
Is Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club safe to eat at?
The rating covers hygiene standards found at inspection, not the food itself. At 4 out of 5, the inspector found hygiene standards at this business to be good, the top end of the scale.
When was Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club last inspected?
Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club was last inspected on 24 July 2025, 11 months ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Waverley Council rather than by the business.
What did the inspector find at Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club?
The inspector scored three areas. Hygienic food handling was rated "good", the cleanliness and condition of the building "very good", and confidence in the management of food safety "generally satisfactory". Lower concern in all three is what earns a high overall rating.
How does Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club compare to other places in Waverley?
79% of the 960 rated food businesses in Waverley hold the top rating of 5, while Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club holds a 4. 113 places in the area share that rating.
Who decides the rating?
Waverley Council inspects Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.
Tell me when this changes
The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch Su Mckie for ChiddingfoldLunch Club and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.
Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →
Understanding this rating
More food hygiene ratings near here
Waverley inspects and rates 1,067 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Waverley →
The official record is held by the council: http://www.waverley.gov.uk
Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →