Pen Castell Pantri Ltd food hygiene rating
Takeaway/sandwich shop · Neath Port Talbot
Pen Castell Pantri Ltd holds a 4, meaning hygiene standards at the takeaway are good. It is a solid result, the inspector found nothing serious, though a 5 was just out of reach.
The rating: 4 - Good
The rating dates from 23 October 2025, 8 months ago. Councils typically re-inspect higher-risk businesses every six months to two years, with well-run, low-risk places visited least often, so this is a normal gap.
Address: Afan Aggregates & Building Supplies, Brytwn Road, Cymmer, SA13 3EW
How it compares in Neath Port Talbot
In Neath Port Talbot, 68% of rated places manage a 5, so Pen Castell Pantri Ltd sits behind roughly 776 nearby businesses. 22% of the borough shares its 4.
| 5 out of 5 | 776 | 68% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 out of 5 | 245 | 22% | ← Pen Castell Pantri Ltd | |
| 3 out of 5 | 70 | 6% | ||
| 2 out of 5 | 10 | 1% | ||
| 1 out of 5 | 37 | 3% | ||
| 0 out of 5 | 1 | <1% |
A further 53 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.
What the inspector found
- Hygienic food handling Very good
- Cleanliness & condition of the building Very good
- How well they manage food safety Generally satisfactory
An inspection scores three things: how food is handled, the physical condition of the premises, and how much the inspector trusts management to keep standards up. At Pen Castell Pantri Ltd none of the three raised a concern, the overall rating is only ever as strong as its weakest area, so a clean sweep is what produces a high score.
Questions about Pen Castell Pantri Ltd
What is Pen Castell Pantri Ltd's food hygiene rating?
Pen Castell Pantri Ltd has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good), given by Neath Port Talbot Council on 23 October 2025.
Is Pen Castell Pantri Ltd safe to eat at?
The rating covers hygiene standards found at inspection, not the food itself. At 4 out of 5, the inspector found hygiene standards at this takeaway to be good, the top end of the scale.
When was Pen Castell Pantri Ltd last inspected?
Pen Castell Pantri Ltd was last inspected on 23 October 2025, 8 months ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Neath Port Talbot Council rather than by the business.
What did the inspector find at Pen Castell Pantri Ltd?
The inspector scored three areas. Hygienic food handling was rated "very good", the cleanliness and condition of the building "very good", and confidence in the management of food safety "generally satisfactory". Lower concern in all three is what earns a high overall rating.
How does Pen Castell Pantri Ltd compare to other places in Neath Port Talbot?
68% of the 1,139 rated food businesses in Neath Port Talbot hold the top rating of 5, while Pen Castell Pantri Ltd holds a 4. 245 places in the area share that rating.
Who decides the rating?
Neath Port Talbot Council inspects Pen Castell Pantri Ltd and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.
Tell me when this changes
The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch Pen Castell Pantri Ltd and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.
Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →
Understanding this rating
More food hygiene ratings near here
Pen Castell Pantri Ltd is one of 124 rated food businesses in Port Talbot. See every hygiene rating in Port Talbot →
Neath Port Talbot inspects and rates 1,192 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Neath Port Talbot →
The official record is held by the council: http://www.npt.gov.uk
Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →