Scranners @ Tanners Arms food hygiene rating
Pub/bar/nightclub · Newcastle Upon Tyne
Scranners @ Tanners Arms holds a 4, meaning hygiene standards at the pub are good. It is a solid result, the inspector found nothing serious, though a 5 was just out of reach.
The rating: 4 - Good
The rating dates from 30 April 2025, 14 months ago. Councils typically re-inspect higher-risk businesses every six months to two years, with well-run, low-risk places visited least often, so this is a normal gap.
Address: 1 Byker Bridge, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 2NS
How it compares in Newcastle Upon Tyne
In Newcastle Upon Tyne, 75% of rated places manage a 5, so Scranners @ Tanners Arms sits behind roughly 1,895 nearby businesses. 13% of the borough shares its 4.
| 5 out of 5 | 1,895 | 75% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 out of 5 | 318 | 13% | ← Scranners @ Tanners Arms | |
| 3 out of 5 | 178 | 7% | ||
| 2 out of 5 | 83 | 3% | ||
| 1 out of 5 | 40 | 2% | ||
| 0 out of 5 | 11 | <1% |
A further 200 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.
Food hygiene ratings nearby
The closest food businesses to Scranners @ Tanners Arms, nearest first, so you can see how it compares to its neighbours.
| Business | Distance | Rating | Inspected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acropolis Street Food Takeaway/sandwich shop | 156 yards away | 5 - Very good | 4 July 2025 |
| Agit Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen | 398 yards away | 5 - Very good | 9 August 2023 |
| Alfie's Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen | 0.3 miles away | 5 - Very good | 10 December 2024 |
| 1901 - Manors Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen | 0.3 miles away | 5 - Very good | 4 February 2026 |
| Baltic Kitchen Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen | 0.4 miles away | 5 - Very good | 29 January 2026 |
| 21 Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen | 0.4 miles away | 5 - Very good | 30 September 2025 |
| Ai Fiori Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen | 0.5 miles away | 5 - Very good | 22 June 2026 |
| Al dente cucina italiana Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen | 0.5 miles away | 5 - Very good | 17 December 2024 |
Questions about Scranners @ Tanners Arms
What is Scranners @ Tanners Arms's food hygiene rating?
Scranners @ Tanners Arms has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good), given by Newcastle Upon Tyne Council on 30 April 2025.
Is Scranners @ Tanners Arms safe to eat at?
The rating covers hygiene standards found at inspection, not the food itself. At 4 out of 5, the inspector found hygiene standards at this pub to be good, the top end of the scale.
When was Scranners @ Tanners Arms last inspected?
Scranners @ Tanners Arms was last inspected on 30 April 2025, 14 months ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Newcastle Upon Tyne Council rather than by the business.
How does Scranners @ Tanners Arms compare to other places in Newcastle Upon Tyne?
75% of the 2,525 rated food businesses in Newcastle Upon Tyne hold the top rating of 5, while Scranners @ Tanners Arms holds a 4. 318 places in the area share that rating.
Who decides the rating?
Newcastle Upon Tyne Council inspects Scranners @ Tanners Arms and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.
Tell me when this changes
The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch Scranners @ Tanners Arms and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.
Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →
Understanding this rating
More food hygiene ratings near here
Newcastle Upon Tyne inspects and rates 2,725 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Newcastle Upon Tyne →
The official record is held by the council: http://www.newcastle.gov.uk/
Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →