4

Sutton Courtenay Football Club food hygiene rating

Pub/bar/nightclub · Vale of White Horse

Sutton Courtenay Football Club holds a 4, meaning hygiene standards at the pub are good. It is a solid result, the inspector found nothing serious, though a 5 was just out of reach.

The rating: 4 - Good

The rating dates from 1 November 2025, 8 months ago. Councils typically re-inspect higher-risk businesses every six months to two years, with well-run, low-risk places visited least often, so this is a normal gap.

Address: Sutton Courtenay Football Club Old Wallingford Road, Sutton Courtenay, Abingdon, OX14 4AR

How it compares in Vale of White Horse

In Vale of White Horse, 81% of rated places manage a 5, so Sutton Courtenay Football Club sits behind roughly 764 nearby businesses. 12% of the borough shares its 4.

Every rated food business in Vale of White Horse
5 out of 5 764 81%
4 out of 5 115 12% ← Sutton Courtenay Football Club
3 out of 5 49 5%
2 out of 5 11 1%
1 out of 5 1 <1%
0 out of 5 0 0%

A further 102 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.

What the inspector found

An inspection scores three things: how food is handled, the physical condition of the premises, and how much the inspector trusts management to keep standards up. At Sutton Courtenay Football Club none of the three raised a concern, the overall rating is only ever as strong as its weakest area, so a clean sweep is what produces a high score.

Questions about Sutton Courtenay Football Club

What is Sutton Courtenay Football Club's food hygiene rating?

Sutton Courtenay Football Club has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good), given by Vale of White Horse Council on 1 November 2025.

Is Sutton Courtenay Football Club safe to eat at?

The rating covers hygiene standards found at inspection, not the food itself. At 4 out of 5, the inspector found hygiene standards at this pub to be good, the top end of the scale.

When was Sutton Courtenay Football Club last inspected?

Sutton Courtenay Football Club was last inspected on 1 November 2025, 8 months ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Vale of White Horse Council rather than by the business.

What did the inspector find at Sutton Courtenay Football Club?

The inspector scored three areas. Hygienic food handling was rated "good", the cleanliness and condition of the building "good", and confidence in the management of food safety "generally satisfactory". Lower concern in all three is what earns a high overall rating.

How does Sutton Courtenay Football Club compare to other places in Vale of White Horse?

81% of the 940 rated food businesses in Vale of White Horse hold the top rating of 5, while Sutton Courtenay Football Club holds a 4. 115 places in the area share that rating.

Who decides the rating?

Vale of White Horse Council inspects Sutton Courtenay Football Club and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.

Tell me when this changes

The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch Sutton Courtenay Football Club and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.

Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →

Understanding this rating

More food hygiene ratings near here

Sutton Courtenay Football Club is one of 175 rated food businesses in Abingdon. See every hygiene rating in Abingdon

Vale of White Horse inspects and rates 1,042 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Vale of White Horse

The official record is held by the council: http://www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk

Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →