4

Wallingford Masonic Hall food hygiene rating

Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen · South Oxfordshire

Wallingford Masonic Hall holds a 4, meaning hygiene standards at the restaurant are good. It is a solid result, the inspector found nothing serious, though a 5 was just out of reach.

The rating: 4 - Good

The rating dates from 8 February 2024, more than 2 years ago. A lot can change in a kitchen in that time, and a rating this old says more about the business then than now. Councils prioritise re-inspecting higher-risk premises, so a long gap often means the business is considered low-risk.

Address: Goldsmiths Lane, Wallingford, Oxon, OX10 0DU

How it compares in South Oxfordshire

In South Oxfordshire, 71% of rated places manage a 5, so Wallingford Masonic Hall sits behind roughly 808 nearby businesses. 16% of the borough shares its 4.

Every rated food business in South Oxfordshire
5 out of 5 808 71%
4 out of 5 186 16% ← Wallingford Masonic Hall
3 out of 5 120 11%
2 out of 5 17 1%
1 out of 5 5 <1%
0 out of 5 0 0%

A further 116 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.

What the inspector found

An inspection scores three things: how food is handled, the physical condition of the premises, and how much the inspector trusts management to keep standards up. At Wallingford Masonic Hall none of the three raised a concern, the overall rating is only ever as strong as its weakest area, so a clean sweep is what produces a high score.

Questions about Wallingford Masonic Hall

What is Wallingford Masonic Hall's food hygiene rating?

Wallingford Masonic Hall has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good), given by South Oxfordshire Council on 8 February 2024.

Is Wallingford Masonic Hall safe to eat at?

The rating covers hygiene standards found at inspection, not the food itself. At 4 out of 5, the inspector found hygiene standards at this restaurant to be good, the top end of the scale.

When was Wallingford Masonic Hall last inspected?

Wallingford Masonic Hall was last inspected on 8 February 2024, more than 2 years ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by South Oxfordshire Council rather than by the business.

What did the inspector find at Wallingford Masonic Hall?

The inspector scored three areas. Hygienic food handling was rated "good", the cleanliness and condition of the building "generally satisfactory", and confidence in the management of food safety "good". Lower concern in all three is what earns a high overall rating.

How does Wallingford Masonic Hall compare to other places in South Oxfordshire?

71% of the 1,136 rated food businesses in South Oxfordshire hold the top rating of 5, while Wallingford Masonic Hall holds a 4. 186 places in the area share that rating.

Who decides the rating?

South Oxfordshire Council inspects Wallingford Masonic Hall and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.

Tell me when this changes

The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch Wallingford Masonic Hall and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.

Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →

Understanding this rating

More food hygiene ratings near here

Wallingford Masonic Hall is one of 430 rated food businesses in Oxon. See every hygiene rating in Oxon

South Oxfordshire inspects and rates 1,252 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in South Oxfordshire

The official record is held by the council: https://www.southoxon.gov.uk

Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →