S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets food hygiene rating
Retailers - other · Ashfield
S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets holds a 4, meaning hygiene standards at the shop are good. It is a solid result, the inspector found nothing serious, though a 5 was just out of reach.
The rating: 4 - Good
The rating dates from 17 July 2023, more than 2 years ago. A lot can change in a kitchen in that time, and a rating this old says more about the business then than now. Councils prioritise re-inspecting higher-risk premises, so a long gap often means the business is considered low-risk.
How it compares in Ashfield
In Ashfield, 78% of rated places manage a 5, so S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets sits behind roughly 668 nearby businesses. 11% of the borough shares its 4.
| 5 out of 5 | 668 | 78% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 out of 5 | 91 | 11% | ← S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets | |
| 3 out of 5 | 42 | 5% | ||
| 2 out of 5 | 17 | 2% | ||
| 1 out of 5 | 35 | 4% | ||
| 0 out of 5 | 1 | <1% |
A further 92 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.
What the inspector found
- Hygienic food handling Generally satisfactory
- Cleanliness & condition of the building Generally satisfactory
- How well they manage food safety Very good
An inspection scores three things: how food is handled, the physical condition of the premises, and how much the inspector trusts management to keep standards up. At S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets none of the three raised a concern, the overall rating is only ever as strong as its weakest area, so a clean sweep is what produces a high score.
Questions about S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets
What is S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets's food hygiene rating?
S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good), given by Ashfield Council on 17 July 2023.
Is S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets safe to eat at?
The rating covers hygiene standards found at inspection, not the food itself. At 4 out of 5, the inspector found hygiene standards at this shop to be good, the top end of the scale.
When was S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets last inspected?
S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets was last inspected on 17 July 2023, more than 2 years ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Ashfield Council rather than by the business.
What did the inspector find at S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets?
The inspector scored three areas. Hygienic food handling was rated "generally satisfactory", the cleanliness and condition of the building "generally satisfactory", and confidence in the management of food safety "very good". Lower concern in all three is what earns a high overall rating.
How does S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets compare to other places in Ashfield?
78% of the 854 rated food businesses in Ashfield hold the top rating of 5, while S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets holds a 4. 91 places in the area share that rating.
Who decides the rating?
Ashfield Council inspects S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.
Tell me when this changes
The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch S.McFarland T/A K & S Sweets and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.
Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →
Understanding this rating
More food hygiene ratings near here
Ashfield inspects and rates 946 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Ashfield →
The official record is held by the council: http://www.ashfield.gov.uk
Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →