3

Arepazo Bros. food hygiene rating

Takeaway/sandwich shop · Camden

Arepazo Bros. holds a 3: generally satisfactory. The takeaway met the legal standard, but the inspector recorded enough minor issues that it fell short of a good or very good rating.

The rating: 3 - Generally satisfactory

This is a fresh result: Arepazo Bros. was inspected on 19 May 2026, so the rating reflects what the inspector found very recently.

Address: West Yard, Camden Lock Place, NW1 8AF

How it compares in Camden

In Camden, 59% of rated places manage a 5, so Arepazo Bros. sits behind roughly 2,647 nearby businesses. 14% of the borough shares its 3.

Every rated food business in Camden
5 out of 5 1,993 59%
4 out of 5 654 19%
3 out of 5 457 14% ← Arepazo Bros.
2 out of 5 127 4%
1 out of 5 90 3%
0 out of 5 52 2%

A further 924 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.

What the inspector found

An inspection scores three things: how food is handled, the physical condition of the premises, and how much the inspector trusts management to keep standards up. At Arepazo Bros. none of the three raised a concern, the overall rating is only ever as strong as its weakest area, so a clean sweep is what produces a high score.

Food hygiene ratings nearby

The closest food businesses to Arepazo Bros., nearest first, so you can see how it compares to its neighbours.

Business Distance Rating Inspected
3 Locks Brewery Pub/bar/nightclub 283 yards away 5 - Very good 5 April 2023
103 Parkway Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen 0.3 miles away 5 - Very good 22 January 2024
Abbey Tavern Pub/bar/nightclub 0.4 miles away 5 - Very good 28 November 2025
130 Primrose Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen 0.5 miles away 5 - Very good 24 June 2026
113 KTV & Korean Kitchen Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen 1.0 miles away 5 - Very good 24 June 2025

Questions about Arepazo Bros.

What is Arepazo Bros.'s food hygiene rating?

Arepazo Bros. has a food hygiene rating of 3 out of 5 (generally satisfactory), given by Camden Council on 19 May 2026.

Is Arepazo Bros. safe to eat at?

A 3 means the takeaway met the legal standard, so it is lawful to eat there, but the inspector recorded issues that stopped it scoring higher. It is the middle of the scale.

When was Arepazo Bros. last inspected?

Arepazo Bros. was last inspected on 19 May 2026, a month ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Camden Council rather than by the business.

What did the inspector find at Arepazo Bros.?

The inspector scored three areas. Hygienic food handling was rated "generally satisfactory", the cleanliness and condition of the building "generally satisfactory", and confidence in the management of food safety "generally satisfactory". Lower concern in all three is what earns a high overall rating.

How does Arepazo Bros. compare to other places in Camden?

59% of the 3,373 rated food businesses in Camden hold the top rating of 5, while Arepazo Bros. holds a 3. 457 places in the area share that rating.

Who decides the rating?

Camden Council inspects Arepazo Bros. and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.

Tell me when this changes

The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch Arepazo Bros. and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.

Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →

Understanding this rating

More food hygiene ratings near here

Camden inspects and rates 4,297 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Camden

The official record is held by the council: http://www.camden.gov.uk

Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →