5

Wings of Kings food hygiene rating

Takeaway/sandwich shop · Lewisham

Wings of Kings holds a 5, the highest food hygiene rating there is. At its last inspection the takeaway met every standard the inspector checked, with nothing needing attention.

The rating: 5 - Very good

The rating dates from 19 November 2025, 7 months ago. Councils typically re-inspect higher-risk businesses every six months to two years, with well-run, low-risk places visited least often, so this is a normal gap.

Address: 445 Brockley Road, London, SE4 2PJ

How it compares in Lewisham

That puts Wings of Kings among the 1,252 places in Lewisham holding top marks, 62% of everywhere the council rates. A 5 is the norm here rather than the exception, so it is the rating to expect, not to be impressed by.

Every rated food business in Lewisham
5 out of 5 1,252 62% ← Wings of Kings
4 out of 5 453 23%
3 out of 5 235 12%
2 out of 5 37 2%
1 out of 5 28 1%
0 out of 5 4 <1%

A further 464 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.

What the inspector found

An inspection scores three things: how food is handled, the physical condition of the premises, and how much the inspector trusts management to keep standards up. At Wings of Kings none of the three raised a concern, the overall rating is only ever as strong as its weakest area, so a clean sweep is what produces a high score.

Food hygiene ratings nearby

The closest food businesses to Wings of Kings, nearest first, so you can see how it compares to its neighbours.

Business Distance Rating Inspected
Alexander Care Centre Caring Premises 0.6 miles away 5 - Very good 3 June 2025
Aquarius golf club (licensed bar) Pub/bar/nightclub 0.7 miles away 5 - Very good 24 August 2023
Abbeyfield Society Caring Premises 0.9 miles away 5 - Very good 25 March 2019

Questions about Wings of Kings

What is Wings of Kings's food hygiene rating?

Wings of Kings has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good), given by Lewisham Council on 19 November 2025.

Is Wings of Kings safe to eat at?

The rating covers hygiene standards found at inspection, not the food itself. At 5 out of 5, the inspector found hygiene standards at this takeaway to be very good, the top end of the scale.

When was Wings of Kings last inspected?

Wings of Kings was last inspected on 19 November 2025, 7 months ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Lewisham Council rather than by the business.

What did the inspector find at Wings of Kings?

The inspector scored three areas. Hygienic food handling was rated "good", the cleanliness and condition of the building "good", and confidence in the management of food safety "good". Lower concern in all three is what earns a high overall rating.

How does Wings of Kings compare to other places in Lewisham?

62% of the 2,009 rated food businesses in Lewisham hold the top rating of 5, and Wings of Kings is one of them.

Who decides the rating?

Lewisham Council inspects Wings of Kings and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.

Tell me when this changes

The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch Wings of Kings and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.

Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →

Understanding this rating

More food hygiene ratings near here

Lewisham inspects and rates 2,473 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Lewisham

The official record is held by the council: http://www.lewisham.gov.uk/myservices/business/food-safety/Pages/default.aspx

Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →