5

Lady T Luscious food hygiene rating

Other catering premises · Manchester

Lady T Luscious holds a 5, the highest food hygiene rating there is. At its last inspection the business met every standard the inspector checked, with nothing needing attention.

The rating: 5 - Very good

This is a fresh result: Lady T Luscious was inspected on 5 August 2026, so the rating reflects what the inspector found very recently.

88% of rated food businesses in Manchester score 4 or 5, so this is a normal, good result for the area. See all Manchester ratings →

How this rating has changed

Lady T Luscious was re-inspected on 5 August 2026 and held its rating of 5.

Inspected Rating Change
5 August 2026 AwaitingInspection 5 Held

The FSA publishes only a business's current rating. This history is our own record of what it has scored since we began watching.

How it compares in Manchester

That puts Lady T Luscious among the 3,693 places in Manchester holding top marks, 71% of everywhere the council rates. A 5 is the norm here rather than the exception, so it is the rating to expect, not to be impressed by.

Every rated food business in Manchester
5 out of 5 3,693 71% ← Lady T Luscious
4 out of 5 855 17%
3 out of 5 381 7%
2 out of 5 112 2%
1 out of 5 120 2%
0 out of 5 13 <1%

A further 1,249 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.

What the inspector found

An inspection scores three things: how food is handled, the physical condition of the premises, and how much the inspector trusts management to keep standards up. At Lady T Luscious none of the three raised a concern, the overall rating is only ever as strong as its weakest area, so a clean sweep is what produces a high score.

Questions about Lady T Luscious

What is Lady T Luscious's food hygiene rating?

Lady T Luscious has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good), given by Manchester Council on 5 August 2026.

Is Lady T Luscious safe to eat at?

The rating covers hygiene standards found at inspection, not the food itself. At 5 out of 5, the inspector found hygiene standards at this business to be very good, the top end of the scale.

When was Lady T Luscious last inspected?

Lady T Luscious was last inspected on 5 August 2026, a month ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Manchester Council rather than by the business.

What did the inspector find at Lady T Luscious?

The inspector scored three areas. Hygienic food handling was rated "very good", the cleanliness and condition of the building "good", and confidence in the management of food safety "good". Lower concern in all three is what earns a high overall rating.

How does Lady T Luscious compare to other places in Manchester?

71% of the 5,174 rated food businesses in Manchester hold the top rating of 5, and Lady T Luscious is one of them.

Who decides the rating?

Manchester Council inspects Lady T Luscious and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.

Tell me when this changes

The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch Lady T Luscious and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.

Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →

Understanding this rating

More food hygiene ratings near here

Manchester inspects and rates 6,423 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Manchester

The official record is held by the council: http://www.manchester.gov.uk

Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →