3

434 Enterprises Ltd. food hygiene rating

Distributors/Transporters · Vale of White Horse

434 Enterprises Ltd. holds a 3: generally satisfactory. The distributor met the legal standard, but the inspector recorded enough minor issues that it fell short of a good or very good rating.

The rating: 3 - Generally satisfactory

This rating dates from 22 July 2024, but the business has been re-inspected and a new rating is awaiting publication, so the score shown here is about to change.

This sits in the middle for Vale of White Horse, where 1% of rated places score below 3 and 93% score 4 or 5. See all Vale of White Horse ratings →

Address: Building S2 (South) Kingston Business Park, Kingston Bagpuize, Abingdon, OX13 5AS

How it compares in Vale of White Horse

In Vale of White Horse, 81% of rated places manage a 5, so 434 Enterprises Ltd. sits behind roughly 898 nearby businesses. 5% of the borough shares its 3.

Every rated food business in Vale of White Horse
5 out of 5 782 81%
4 out of 5 116 12%
3 out of 5 50 5% ← 434 Enterprises Ltd.
2 out of 5 10 1%
1 out of 5 2 <1%
0 out of 5 0 0%

A further 83 businesses in the area are awaiting inspection or exempt, so are not counted above.

What the inspector found

An inspection scores three things: how food is handled, the physical condition of the premises, and how much the inspector trusts management to keep standards up. At 434 Enterprises Ltd. none of the three raised a concern, the overall rating is only ever as strong as its weakest area, so a clean sweep is what produces a high score.

Questions about 434 Enterprises Ltd.

What is 434 Enterprises Ltd.'s food hygiene rating?

434 Enterprises Ltd. has a food hygiene rating of 3 out of 5 (generally satisfactory), given by Vale of White Horse Council on 22 July 2024.

Is 434 Enterprises Ltd. safe to eat at?

A 3 means the distributor met the legal standard, so it is lawful to eat there, but the inspector recorded issues that stopped it scoring higher. It is the middle of the scale.

When was 434 Enterprises Ltd. last inspected?

434 Enterprises Ltd. was last inspected on 22 July 2024, more than 2 years ago. Food hygiene inspections are unannounced, and the rating is published by Vale of White Horse Council rather than by the business.

What did the inspector find at 434 Enterprises Ltd.?

The inspector scored three areas. Hygienic food handling was rated "good", the cleanliness and condition of the building "generally satisfactory", and confidence in the management of food safety "generally satisfactory". Lower concern in all three is what earns a high overall rating.

How does 434 Enterprises Ltd. compare to other places in Vale of White Horse?

81% of the 960 rated food businesses in Vale of White Horse hold the top rating of 5, while 434 Enterprises Ltd. holds a 3. 50 places in the area share that rating.

Who decides the rating?

Vale of White Horse Council inspects 434 Enterprises Ltd. and sets the rating; the Food Standards Agency publishes it. Neither the business nor this site can change a rating, a business that disagrees can appeal to its council, and can request a re-inspection once it has fixed the problems.

Tell me when this changes

The Food Standards Agency publishes only a business's rating today, not what it scored before, and not when it moves. We check every UK rating each night. Watch 434 Enterprises Ltd. and we will email you the morning after its rating changes.

Free, for three businesses, forever. No password, we send you a link. How rating alerts work →

Understanding this rating

More food hygiene ratings near here

434 Enterprises Ltd. is one of 172 rated food businesses in Abingdon. See every hygiene rating in Abingdon

Vale of White Horse inspects and rates 1,043 food businesses across its whole area. See every food hygiene rating in Vale of White Horse

The official record is held by the council: http://www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk

Rating from the Food Standards Agency under the Open Government Licence. Ratings reflect standards found at the time of inspection and can change. If you think a rating is wrong, the official record is held by the FSA and the local authority; corrections there flow through here. How ratings work →